This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by BRINES, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Exchange Value of Housework

University of Washington

Explaining persistent inequalities in the division of household labor amid secular change in women's employment patterns and in sex-role attitudes remains a challenge for sociologists and economists. The predominant conceptual solutions draw from a unifying paradigm of genderneutral exchange, and furthermore align with economic or quasi-economic images of purposive action. This article analyzes three models from this class of explanations—the human capital theory of household time allocation, the resource-bargaining perspective on marital power, and the economic dependency model—using data from a nationally representative sample of U.S. households. The results fail to support any of the three variations on the theme of gender neutrality in the principles governing the division of household labor. Instead, the pattern of negative findings provokes consideration of how husbands' and wives' housework behavior might serve as a vehicle of symbolic display. Evidence is presented suggesting that among couples whose earnings arrangement seriously deviates from the gender norm, housework is used symbolically to reassert one's "essential" masculinity or femininity. Overall, the results support a more expansive view of spousal exchange as a means of addressing the puzzle of why housework remains "women's work."

Rationality and Society, Vol. 5, No. 3, 302-340 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/1043463193005003003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. M. Kunovich and S. Kunovich Gender Dependence and Attitudes toward the Distribution of Household Labor: A Comparative and Multilevel Analysis International Journal of Comparative Sociology, December 1, 2008; 49(6): 395 - 427. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Knudsen and K. Waerness National Context and Spouses' Housework in 34 Countries Eur. Sociol. Rev., February 1, 2008; 24(1): 97 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Evertsson and M. Nermo Changing Resources and the Division of Housework: A Longitudinal Study of Swedish Couples Eur. Sociol. Rev., September 1, 2007; 23(4): 455 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. N. Davis, T. N. Greenstein, and J. P. Gerteisen Marks Effects of Union Type on Division of Household Labor: Do Cohabiting Men Really Perform More Housework? Journal of Family Issues, September 1, 2007; 28(9): 1246 - 1272. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Hank and H. Jurges Gender and the Division of Household Labor in Older Couples: A European Perspective Journal of Family Issues, March 1, 2007; 28(3): 399 - 421. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. P. Cooke Policy, Preferences, and Patriarchy: The Division of Domestic Labor in East Germany, West Germany, and the United States Soc. Pol., March 1, 2006; 13(1): 117 - 143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Yodanis Divorce Culture and Marital Gender Equality: A Cross-National Study Gender Society, October 1, 2005; 19(5): 644 - 659. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Hallerod Sharing of Housework and Money Among Swedish Couples: Do They Behave Rationally? Eur. Sociol. Rev., July 1, 2005; 21(3): 273 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kroska Divisions of Domestic Work: Revising and Expanding the Theoretical Explanations Journal of Family Issues, October 1, 2004; 25(7): 900 - 932. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Cubbins and D. Vannoy Division of Household Labor as a Source of Contention for Married and Cohabiting Couples in Metropolitan Moscow Journal of Family Issues, March 1, 2004; 25(2): 182 - 215. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Wallace Household Strategies: Their Conceptual Relevance and Analytical Scope in Social Research Sociology, May 1, 2002; 36(2): 275 - 292. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Layte Gendered Equity? Comparing Explanations of Women's Satisfaction with the Domestic Division of Labour Work Employment Society, September 1, 1998; 12(3): 511 - 532. [PDF]

				K. M. Greaves, A. M. Zvonkovic, L. S. Evans, and L. D. Hall Economic Resources, Influence, and Stress among Married Couples Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, September 1, 1995; 24(1): 47 - 70. [Abstract]